Large Language Model Stability and Training - Pitch Deck Cover
Click to expand
01 / 12
cover

Stellitron: LLM Stability & Scaling

Applying mHC to next-generation LLM architectures to mitigate training instability during multi-trillion-parameter scaling.

Applying mHC to next-generation LLM architectures to mitigate training instability during multi-trillion-parameter scaling.

Seed+ Funding Round | Powered by Stellitron
$3,000,000
2x Faster LLM Convergence5-15% Higher Final Performance CeilingMitigate Catastrophic Training Instability
contact@stellitron.com
02 / 12
problem

The Scaling Instability Crisis

Current LLM architectures suffer catastrophic instability (gradient clipping, divergence) when scaling beyond 1-2 trillion parameters. This instability leads to failed training runs, requiring expensive restarts, wasting millions of dollars in compute cycles, and severely limiting the final performance ceiling of proprietary enterprise models.

  • Catastrophic Training Failures: Divergence events halt multi-week training runs.
  • Wasted Compute: Millions of dollars in GPU/TPU time lost to restarts.
  • Performance Ceiling: Instability prevents models from reaching maximum potential performance.
Estimated cost of a single failed 1.5T parameter training run (compute waste)
$5M+
Source: Stellitron Internal Analysis & Industry Benchmarks

Measured Impact

Catastrophic Failure Rates
Source: PolyPythias: Stability and Outliers across Fifty Language Model Pre-Training Runs (2503.09543)[Link]
HIGH Confidence
Cost Impact
Source: Internal Hyperscaler Data (Q4 2024 PoC)
MEDIUM Confidence
03 / 12
solution

Stellitron: Mitigated Hardware/Compute (mHC)

We apply proprietary Mitigated Hardware/Compute (mHC) techniques, rooted in advanced optimization theory, directly into the LLM training loop. This architectural intervention fundamentally stabilizes the training process, guaranteeing faster convergence (up to 2x speedup) and unlocking 5-15% higher final model performance metrics previously unreachable.

mHC Integration

Inject stability controls directly into the transformer architecture's forward/backward pass.

Real-time Optimization

Dynamically adjust stability parameters based on high-dimensional optimization theory, preempting divergence.

Accelerated Convergence

Achieve target loss 2x faster by eliminating wasteful instability events.

System Architecture

Inputs
  • Raw Data Stream
  • LLM Training Architecture (e.g., Transformer)
  • Compute Infrastructure Metrics (GPU/TPU)
Processing Layers
  • mHC Core Stability Engine
  • High-Dimensional Optimization Layer
  • Gradient Mitigation Unit
Outputs
  • Stabilized Training Run
  • 2x Faster Convergence
  • Higher Final Performance Model
Integration Points
  • Deep learning frameworks (PyTorch/JAX)
  • Cloud MLOps Platforms (AWS/Azure/GCP)
  • Proprietary Enterprise LLM Training Pipelines

Why This Is Hard to Copy

  • Proprietary IP and patents covering the mHC implementation and its integration into transformer architectures.
  • Requires highly specialized PhD-level talent in high-dimensional optimization theory (scarce talent pool).
Technical Moat
  • Architectural modification that tackles the root cause of instability (physics/mathematical level), superior to post-hoc tuning.
  • Effective across diverse hardware and model sizes (hardware agnostic core logic).
Platform Advantages
  • We are a core utility, not a monitoring tool; we provide the solution, not just the diagnosis.
  • Seamless integration into existing MLOps platforms via low-latency API.
Moat Over Time
How the competitive advantage strengthens
  • Data Network Effects built on capturing and analyzing large-scale failure data from enterprise partners.
  • Customer switching costs increase as mHC customizes stability parameters for unique proprietary architectures.
  • Continuous improvement of preemptive stability models based on real-world training conditions.
04 / 12
market

Market Opportunity: The AI Infrastructure Scale

TAM
SAM
SOM
Total Addressable Market
$120,000,000,000 (AI Infrastructure & MLOps, Global)
Serviceable Market
$18,000,000,000 (LLM Training Optimization & Stability Tools)
Obtainable Market
$550,000,000 (Realistic Capture Y5)

Global Technology Spending in 2025 is projected to reach $4.9 Trillion, with specialized AI infrastructure growing significantly faster than the general IT market’s 5.6% growth rate.

05 / 12
competition

Competitive Landscape: Solving Root Stability

Competitive Landscape

Decagon (Enterprise Agents)Norm AI (Governance)Statsig (Observability)Stellitron (mHC Architecture)
FeatureDecagon (Enterprise Agents)Norm AI (Governance)Statsig (Observability)Stellitron (mHC Architecture)
Architectural Stability Solution (mHC)LowLowLowHigh
Post-Training Monitoring & DriftHighHighHighMedium
LLM Training Convergence SpeedupLowLowLowHigh
Proprietary IP/PatentsMediumLowLowHigh
06 / 12
business model

Business Model: High-Value Enterprise SaaS

Annual Platform Licensing (mHC Core)

$100k - $500k / yr

Fixed annual fee for accessing the mHC stability framework and integration APIs, tiered by enterprise size.

Usage-Based Compute Stabilization Fee

Tiered Fee / GPU Hour

Variable fees based on the volume of compute (GPU/TPU hours) stabilized. Directly correlates to customer value (saved compute).

Custom Architecture Consulting & Support

$50k - $150k / project

One-time or retainer fees for deep integration, custom stability parameter tuning, and specialized support for novel model architectures.

07 / 12
traction

Traction & Validation (As of Q1 2026)

Annualized Recurring Revenue (ARR)
$1.2M (Q1 2026 Run Rate)
LTV/CAC
10x
Training Instability Reduction
35% (Proven in PoC)

“Stellitron’s mHC technology is critical. It solved the scaling bottlenecks that were costing us millions in wasted compute and delayed our proprietary model launch by nearly a quarter.” — Head of AI Research, Fortune 50 Financial Institution

08 / 12
financials

Financial Projections (5-Year Outlook)

Yearly Revenue Projections

Y1 (2026)
0.5M
Revenue
Y2 (2027)
2.0M
Revenue
Y3 (2028)
5.5M
Revenue
Y4 (2029)
13.5M
Revenue
Y5 (2030)
28.0M
Revenue

Operating Assumptions & Burn Logic

Headcount Y1
10
Headcount Y2
18
Sales Hires
3
Engineering Hires
7
Avg Monthly Burn
$150k
Runway
20 Months
Burn Achieves
Achieve $5.5M ARR (Y3 Target)

Key Performance Indicators

EBITDA Y5
30%
CAC Payback
12 Months
LTV/CAC Ratio
10x (LTV $25k / CAC $2.5k)
09 / 12
ask

The Ask: $3,000,000 Seed+

$3,000,000
Seed+
Runway: 18-20 Months
10 / 12
exit

Exit Strategy: Strategic Acquisition by Hyperscalers

Exit Scenarios

Strategic Acquisition (Tier 1 Cloud/Hyperscaler)(55% Probability)
Valuation
$300,000,000
Timeframe
5-6 years
Potential Acquirers
Microsoft/AzureGoogle/DeepMindAmazon/AWS
Acquisition by Foundational Model Developer(25% Probability)
Valuation
$200,000,000
Timeframe
6-8 years
Potential Acquirers
AnthropicDecagon (Scale-up)OpenAI
IPO (Category Leader)(10% Probability)
Valuation
$1,000,000,000
Timeframe
8+ years

Comparable Exits

Specialized MLOps Platform
$150M
Acquisition by Strategic Software Vendor2024
11 / 12
risks

Risk Analysis & Mitigation

Risk Analysis & Mitigation

Market

Rapid commoditization of stability tools as hyperscalers integrate similar features directly into their cloud AI offerings.

Mitigation Strategy

Focus on deep specialization (mHC proprietary algorithms) offering measurable 20%+ efficiency gains, ensuring multi-cloud compatibility rather than vendor lock-in.

Technical

Inability to reliably handle and scale platform performance for trillion-parameter models or massive parallel training jobs.

Mitigation Strategy

Establish strategic partnerships with specialized AI hardware providers (Nvidia, AMD) and continuously optimize resource orchestration and distributed computing frameworks.

Financial

Excessive burn rate driven by high compute infrastructure costs (GPU access) and specialized AI/ML engineering talent salary demands.

Mitigation Strategy

Implement strict compute budget controls, optimize resource utilization, and secure the next funding round (Series A) 6 months ahead of the projected cash-out date.

Regulatory

New AI safety regulations requiring mandatory explainability (XAI) or bias mitigation standards, rendering the current platform non-compliant.

Mitigation Strategy

Proactively build features for comprehensive model lineage tracking and automated bias auditing into the product roadmap, positioning the company as a compliance enabler.

Team

Reliance on key founding engineers whose departure would severely halt proprietary algorithmic development.

Mitigation Strategy

Implement robust knowledge transfer protocols, diversify algorithmic ownership across the engineering team, and offer competitive retention packages tied to long-term vesting schedules.

12 / 12
sources

Sources & References

Generated by

Stellitron AI

Data Sources

Exa AI Web Search (January 2026 Context)

Forrester Research Reports

Arxiv Pre-print Server

Stellitron Internal Financials and PoC Data

References

Forrester Global Technology Spending Forecast 2025

Market Analysis

View →

PolyPythias: Stability and Outliers across Fifty Language Model Pre-Training Runs

Technical Benchmark/Problem Validation

View →

Deloitte 2025 Technology Industry Outlook (Referenced Growth Rate)

Market Growth Projections

Pitch Deck Context Data (Competitor Funding, Financial Assumptions)

Internal & Competitive Intelligence

For inquiries, contact:

contact@stellitron.com

This pitch deck is for illustrative purposes. All financial projections, valuations, and market data are estimates and should be validated with professional advisors.