A scoping assistant you can question.
The Possibility Lab turns a problem from any field into a proposed workflow: specialist roles, connections, outputs and the points where a person decides.
Try it with your problemWe design and build agentic AI systems on solid cloud and data foundations, with people approving the decisions that matter. Describe a problem from any field and get a proposed workflow to review: the specialist roles, the human checkpoints, and how a pilot would be measured.
The clearest evidence of how we work is working software. These run here, today, and you can use them.
The Possibility Lab turns a problem from any field into a proposed workflow: specialist roles, connections, outputs and the points where a person decides.
Try it with your problemTen stages find recent research, check sources, draft and review. Nothing publishes until a person approves it, and every source is kept for audit.
How the stages coordinateRequest quotas, daily spending budgets, duplicate-run protection and bounded provider calls keep the AI features predictable to operate.
Security & technical strategyYour workflow is the starting point. Explore these small examples, or bring a challenge from a completely different field.
Explore your own possibilityAgriculture, education, energy, logistics, creative work—or a niche we haven’t named. Describe the challenge and explore a workflow shaped around it.
Bring your own challengeChange the budget and delivery window. See which suppliers qualify and why.
Try the interactive sampleExplore a scheduling workflow with administrative checks and a human handoff.
Try the interactive sampleAdjust inventory and incoming orders. Watch the fulfillment plan change.
Try the interactive sampleChange a simulated route condition. See the proposed path and operator checkpoint.
Try the interactive sampleBy industry: Banking & financial services · Insurance · Healthcare · Retail & e-commerce · Logistics, supply chain & procurement
Examples to explore. Sample demos use synthetic data; your tailored preview proposes a workflow for review.
Useful agents need more than a model. We connect orchestration, data, infrastructure, and evaluation to the outcome your team needs.
Design agents around the work your team needs done. Coordinate reasoning, tools, and specialist roles with evaluation, explicit permissions, and human oversight.
Explore the capabilityGive your product a foundation that is observable, maintainable, and designed for its actual workload. Make the tradeoffs around cost and scale explicit.
Explore the capabilityConnect fragmented information and make it useful. Design pipelines and integrations that move the right data to the right place.
Explore the capabilityMake security and ownership part of the architecture. Understand your risks, prioritize the work, and give your team a practical technical roadmap.
Explore the capabilityYou should always know what we’re solving, why a decision was made, and what comes next.
Inside our approachStart with the people, the workflow, and the business goal. Agree on what success means before choosing the technology.
Map the architecture, test the riskiest assumptions, and shape a scope that fits your constraints.
Work in visible increments. Review functioning software together and use the feedback to guide the next decision.
Make deployment, documentation, observability, and handover part of the work from the beginning.
The questions teams usually ask before a first conversation.
The scoping call is free. A two-week discovery sprint is from $4,500, and a 6–8 week pilot is from $18,000, both at fixed prices agreed before work starts. View pricing
A clear view of the problem, the constraints that matter, and a proposed next step. If you use the Possibility Lab first, you can bring its workflow proposal and a downloadable brief, so the conversation starts from your specifics.
No. Scoping works from your description, and the interactive samples use synthetic data. Access to real systems is designed during architecture, with explicit permissions agreed before anything connects.
Only where you decide they should. We design human checkpoints for consequential actions, so people review and approve the decisions that carry real risk.
Yes. The examples illustrate the approach; they are not a boundary. Describe your workflow in the Possibility Lab and see how it could be structured.
Deployment, documentation, observability and handover are part of the work from the start, so your team can run and extend the system without depending on us.
Explore research, business possibilities, and the work behind a useful pilot. Each story connects primary sources with a clearly labeled implementation proposal.
Explore all field notes8 field notes across industries. These examples don’t limit what we can explore together.
The research behind planning, tools, and reliable execution.
A practical way to choose between fixed workflows, tool-using agents, and specialist teams—starting with a decision your business can actually verify.
2 primary sourcesWhat Co-Scientist and ChemCrow suggest about tool-assisted research, and a proposed evidence workflow that preserves uncertainty and expert review.
2 primary sourcesFrom a real operational question to a pilot you can measure.
How to turn quotes, delivery constraints and approval policies into a traceable comparison—without letting a model invent the winning supplier.
1 primary sourceWhy available stock, reserved units and location matter more than a convincing sales reply—and how to design an exception workflow around them.
1 primary sourceA read-only incident-assistance blueprint that joins equipment signals with manuals and maintenance history, while keeping control boundaries clear.
2 primary sourcesA logistics blueprint that separates constraint solving from conversational coordination, so proposed plans remain feasible and inspectable.
1 primary sourceExplore systems where verification and human control come first.
A careful administrative blueprint for proposed appointments, resource checks and staff confirmation, grounded in the FHIR scheduling model.
1 primary sourceWhat OpenVLA shows about learned robot policies, and why a first business pilot should separate task planning from physical execution.
2 primary sourcesA GOOD PLACE TO START
A conversation about your goals, constraints, and next step.
Recent arXiv papers discovered by the research workflow. Preprints and author claims require evaluation.
As AI agents increasingly rely on external tools, accurate retrieval is essential for reliable behavior. Existing methods optimize semantic relevance but largely ignore tool…
Excerpt from the authors’ abstract.
Evaluate for your businessPersonal agents increasingly connect to services across the web and applications by using tools. As the effects of their actions accumulate and interact across…
Excerpt from the authors’ abstract.
Evaluate for your businessDeploying language-model agents onboard mobile robots requires task reasoning and responsive execution within limited compute and memory. We propose BT-Agent, an onboard architecture combining…
Excerpt from the authors’ abstract.
Evaluate for your businessA central challenge in embodied recursive self-improvement is enabling agents to convert interaction history into capabilities that persist beyond one world and transfer to…
Excerpt from the authors’ abstract.
Evaluate for your businessHow well can vision-language models (VLMs) reason about what is missing from an image? We study this question with OccludeBench, a manually curated benchmark…
Excerpt from the authors’ abstract.
Evaluate for your businessMulti-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has become a prominent research direction, particularly within collective robotics, where the ARGoS simulator is widely used to study emergent…
Excerpt from the authors’ abstract.
Evaluate for your businessTraining long-horizon language model agents requires assigning credit to intermediate decisions from sparse terminal feedback. Within a finite group of sibling rollouts, useful action…
Excerpt from the authors’ abstract.
Evaluate for your businessCooperative multi-agent tasks often impose constraints on a shared objective or collective safety. A team level violation cost function can measure this constraint outcome,…
Excerpt from the authors’ abstract.
Evaluate for your business